• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
FilmProfit

FilmProfit

The Business of Successful Films

  • About Us
    • A Little History
    • Our Clients
    • Our License Agreement
    • Our Terms of Use/Your Privacy
  • Services
    • Financial Models
      • Some Additions to Filmmakers Financials Package
    • Comparable Pictures ROIs
    • Audience Analysis
    • Indie Horror Special Packages
    • Indie Low Budget Art-House Special Packages
    • Confidence and Probability Studies
    • Greenlight Analysis
    • Strategic Business Plans
    • Slate and Fund Strategies
    • FilmProfit Reports Shop
  • Our Thinking Lately
  • Contact Us
  • Opt-out preferences

Booksmart Release – Is This the New Way We Distribute Indie Films?

You are here: Home / Our Thinking Lately / Booksmart Release – Is This the New Way We Distribute Indie Films?

June 14, 2019 By JNH Leave a Comment

Having read quite a few mentions of the Booksmart film not performing up to snuff, or to expectations, and even discussion as to whether this augurs weakness for women-themed films, or women-helmed films, I wanted to look.

The Booksmart Duo

A Wide Release

Then I started to look at the release that was playing out for the comedy, and quickly came to my own conclusion that there seemed to be a disconnect between the movie’s most likely audience and the way it was booked and marketed. Why was a film that requires a core audience with educated and generally open-minded sensibilities, funny and even at times raunchy though it may be, released more like it was a teen horror movie? 2500+ opening screens? If it can’t perform under these conditions, then doom can only be skirted by prayer.

I have also seen some discussion that there are tendencies to move in this direction, away from indie platforming. This doesn’t yet appear to be an overall tendency, but, even if others are jumping off the bridge (as our mom’s always used to say) doesn’t mean it’s smart. Are we heading toward only wide or all-digital indie strategy? Can’t a theater audience have a chance to catch up with a picture anymore?

Serious Critical Acclaim

Critics seemed to love the film, with all the upper echelons giving it a 90 to 100 rating. But the release team must have let it all go to their heads, because critics speak to a very particular audience, not the entire available movie audience. Oh, and, by the way, there is a large swath of the movie-going public that likes to stick a thumb in the eyes of the critics. They are not the typical audience for these kinds of films, by the way. So, if the critics love it, the movie will not be for them, and if the critics hate it, some want to see it even more.

Smart movies are primarily for smart people, and critics are generally (not always) themselves, smart people. I mean, the word “smart” is in the title, and they aren’t trying to be snarky using that word.

Booksmart Is a Smart Movie

The story is that, when two girls, best friends and academic superstars, Molly and Amy, who have focused single-mindedly on their studies for four years, learn on the eve of high school graduation that the kids who partied while they worked, got into the same elite schools they did. What was all that for? Now, they have decided to cram everything else they missed in those four years, all into one night. Booksmart is rated R because it looks and sounds like real life!

Market and Release Smart

This film is rated R, so it is not for teenagers, though there are some, when they hear about it, who will aspire to attend. It’s for adults, and since when, if it wasn’t schmaltzy, was a film about booksmart people for people who are not educated, primarily urban, primarily upscale. This is not a creature feature. All of these items scream that the film would very likely have a smart audience, primarily made up of women, only partially because it is about women, and that they would of necessity be older than 17. This describes what we used to call a “Specialty Film,” or an arthouse film. Well, the arthouse audience is generally two thirds female, and it trends largely mature, and this audience generally goes out to the movies, not exactly on Friday or Saturday date nights, but the days and nights they can fit it into their schedules. Oh, one more thing, they often wait to see a movie after the first weekend, even often after the second or the third weekend. They are not in a teenage hurry. They need to be wooed, and allowed to find out more, and to fit it into their schedules.

So, Was Opening on 2500+ Screens a Smart Move?

In the right hands, a film like this might have found an audience growing and growing and growing, instead of watching it dwindle. Why didn’t it open on 50 or 200 screens and build on the critical acclaim and build its word of mouth? This film, if handled correctly, could have been a great little “Art House Plus” film.

Art-house audiences are already primarily women, are already adult, trend mature, and are a stable target for smart films. Expanding on that, we have other urbanites and near suburbanites who hanker for a wide perspective, different sensibilities, LGBTQ characters, and different looks at life. These audiences respond slower, attend in following weeks, and are loyal to films that please them. In fact, women especially want their friends to also see a film they enjoyed and to love the experience, too. That can’t happen opening weekend. They embrace topics that can be taboo or racy or wistful, even raunchy, and they are agnostic about sexual content in films. They want to see some life in front of them. So, why did the bookers and marketers spend so much money releasing this film like it was Lights Out or something?

Over-amped Release Costs Can Crush a Film’s Value

The truth is, every film type has a different arc of upswing and downtrend, and well-handled Art House Plus films are in careful, nurturing hands, managing the opening theaters, targeting the audience, teasing them out and allowing them to become familiar with it across time. Comedies go up fast, like rockets, and fall to earth the same, fast. But smart films do a slow windup, and then stick with their target audience over time, allowing them to get to it, and keeping a tight rein on the marketing spend so that the tickets you sell don’t just all go to paying off marketing spend. I wish Booksmart’s team had thought through this film’s release strategy better, and then, I suspect, there would be less carping, hand-wringing and worrying about what this film augurs.

Some Numbers:

  • -$6,000,000 Budget
  • -$20,000,000 at least Prints & Ads (2500+ screens)
  • +$18,000,000 three weeks BO
  • =$17,000,000 in the hole today
  • Needing another nearly $40,000,000 million in BO to get out.

Oh well, exuberance! I wish I was saying, fantastic, discipline, and here come even more certain chances for women. Bravo on the film, I just wish the release had nudged it toward a rolling success, instead of bludgeoning it with exuberance.

Coda: When I read or hear that a new filmmaker has had their low-budget picture picked up at Sundance, or Toronto, or wherever, and they crow that the distributor promised to spend $20 million on marketing, I usually go “Uh-oh, there goes value out the window.”

Another Coda: We were down due to hacking for a bit, and happy to be back, we are offering a Thank You discount. You can use if for Filmmaker’s Financials or Producer’s Financials, limited time, limited number, so if it fits you, use it! Use it here: https://shop.filmprofit.com/

If you are new to us, you can get our Newsletters by signing up here: https://tinyletter.com/FilmProfit (powered by TinyLetter)

Onward and Upward!

Filed Under: Our Thinking Lately Tagged With: Art House, Box Office, Demographics of Moviegoers, Female Moviegoers, Release Planning, Wide Release

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Part 2: A Bit More from The Interview by Nancy Fulton
  • Jeffrey Hardy Interviewed by Nancy Fulton
  • What in Holy Hell Are Indie Films Facing in 2021?
  • Comparable Pictures (ROIs) List
  • Indies Lose Freedom (and money) Under Studio-Set Deals
  • Booksmart Release – Is This the New Way We Distribute Indie Films?
  • Retreat from 2017 Panic!
  • Key Risks in Making a Film, Part III
  • “Big” Data or “Smart” Data
  • How Do We Arrive At A Film’s Projections Model?

Footer

Our Thinking Lately Blog

  • Part 2: A Bit More from The Interview by Nancy Fulton
  • Jeffrey Hardy Interviewed by Nancy Fulton
  • What in Holy Hell Are Indie Films Facing in 2021?
  • Comparable Pictures (ROIs) List
  • Indies Lose Freedom (and money) Under Studio-Set Deals
  • Booksmart Release – Is This the New Way We Distribute Indie Films?
  • Retreat from 2017 Panic!

Navigation

  • About Us
    • A Little History
    • Our Clients
    • Our License Agreement
    • Our Terms of Use/Your Privacy
  • Services
    • Financial Models
      • Some Additions to Filmmakers Financials Package
    • Comparable Pictures ROIs
    • Audience Analysis
    • Indie Horror Special Packages
    • Indie Low Budget Art-House Special Packages
    • Confidence and Probability Studies
    • Greenlight Analysis
    • Strategic Business Plans
    • Slate and Fund Strategies
    • FilmProfit Reports Shop
  • Our Thinking Lately
  • Contact Us
  • Opt-out preferences

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

powered by TinyLetter

Copyright © 2022 FilmProfit, LLC | All Rights Reserved | FilmProfit is a Registered Trademark of FilmProfit, LLC

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}